NewsPulse Logo
Israel Divided Over Proposed Death Penalty Law
politicsisraelpalestinehuman-rights

Israel Divided Over Proposed Death Penalty Law

•
Marcus ChenMarcus Chen
Share

Israel Divided Over Proposed Death Penalty Law

The Israeli government is considering a highly controversial new law that would introduce the death penalty for Palestinians convicted of fatal terrorist attacks, sparking heated debates and concerns over racialized capital punishment. The proposed legislation, put forward by the far-right Jewish Power party, has been met with opposition from human rights groups and some lawmakers, who argue that it is unethical and would deepen discrimination against Palestinians. The bill has already passed its first reading in the Knesset, Israel's parliament, with 39 votes in favor and 16 against.

Key Highlights

  • Israel has only used the death penalty twice, with the last instance being over 60 years ago
  • The proposed law would apply exclusively to Palestinians convicted of deadly terrorist attacks
  • Human rights groups argue that the bill is "one of the most extreme legislative proposals" in Israel's history
  • The law would allow for mandatory death sentences in Israeli military courts
  • The bill's supporters claim it would serve as a deterrent and prevent future hostage-taking
  • Opponents argue that the law is racially designed and would violate international law
  • The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights has urged Israel to drop the proposed legislation
  • The Israeli government has denied allegations of torture and ill-treatment of Palestinian prisoners

The Deep Context

The proposal to reintroduce the death penalty in Israel is not new, but it has gained momentum in the wake of the Hamas-led attacks on 7 October 2023, which resulted in the deaths of over 1,200 people. The far-right Jewish Power party has been pushing for the death penalty as a means of deterrence, with party leader Itamar Ben-Gvir arguing that it would prevent future hostage-taking and reduce the incentive for terrorist attacks. However, human rights groups and opposition lawmakers have expressed concerns that the law would be applied unfairly and would target only Palestinians, while Jewish Israelis who commit similar crimes would not face the same punishment. As noted by Tal Steiner, executive director of the Israeli NGO HaMoked, "The fact that we're even re-discussing bringing this back into the legal system in Israel is itself a low point." The UN Committee against Torture has also expressed concern over the proposed law, citing allegations of torture and ill-treatment of Palestinian prisoners. For more information on the proposed law, see Israel's Death Penalty Bill Would Bring Darkness, Not Deterrence.

Voices from the Streets

The proposed death penalty law has sparked heated debates and emotional reactions from families of victims and survivors of terrorist attacks. Dr. Valentina Gusak, whose daughter was killed in the 7 October 2023 attacks, has expressed support for the bill, arguing that it would serve as a deterrent and prevent future attacks. However, Aida Touma-Suleiman, an Arab-Israeli lawmaker, has opposed the bill, arguing that it would not address the root causes of terrorism and would only serve to further polarize Israeli society. As noted by Limor Son Har-Melech, a member of the Jewish Power party, the bill is necessary to prevent future attacks and to provide justice for the victims of terrorism. For more information on the perspectives of families of victims and survivors, see A vaccine against murder'? Israel split over return of death penalty.

Legislative & Jurisdictional Conflict

The proposed death penalty law has raised concerns over its compatibility with international law and Israel's obligations under human rights treaties. The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights has urged Israel to drop the proposed legislation, citing concerns over its discriminatory nature and potential to violate international law. The Israeli government has denied allegations of torture and ill-treatment of Palestinian prisoners, but human rights groups continue to raise concerns over the treatment of Palestinian detainees. For more information on the legislative and jurisdictional implications of the proposed law, see Moral, legal issues with Israel’s terrorist death penalty.

Projections & Critical Questions

As the proposed death penalty law continues to be debated in the Knesset, critical questions remain over its potential impact on Israeli society and the broader region. Will the law serve as a deterrent, or will it only exacerbate tensions and lead to further violence? How will the law be applied in practice, and will it be used to target only Palestinians, or will it also be applied to Jewish Israelis who commit similar crimes? What are the implications of the law for Israel's international relationships and its obligations under human rights treaties? For more information on the potential implications of the proposed law, see Israel's Death Penalty Bill Desecrates Holocaust Remembrance Day.

Related Coverage

Discussion

Back to all articles